The Delaware Court of Chancery, in In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 2017-0337-SG (consol.), memo. op. (Del. Ch. July 9, 2020), found a special litigation committee properly withheld materials from an investigation of derivative claims under the work product doctrine, despite concluding the company’s interests would be best served by permitting plaintiff to litigate its claims.

NEW:  Morris James discusses the decision in Chancery Denies Derivative Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Work Product Prepared by Oracle’s Special Litigation Committee.

Morris James discusses the decision in Court of Chancery Dismisses Aiding and Abetting Claim Against NetSuite’s Fiduciaries for Role in Alleged Overpayment by Oracle.

K&L Gates discusses the decision in Oracle Special Litigation Committee Defeats Motion to Compel Production of Protected Work Product.

$$$ Law360 discusses the decision in Chancery OKs Oracle Panel Doc Hold-back In $9B Merger Suit.